“There are over one million commercial road transport companies in the EU, 80% of which are SMEs,” says IRU’s EU Advocacy Director Raluca Marian. Transport operators will be penalised if the basic conditions needed to shift to alternative-fuelled vehicles are not in place: zero-emission vehicles are available and affordable in sufficient numbers, and a dense EU network of alternative fuels infrastructure is in place. However, our sector is concerned about the real risk of an increased cost base. Most notably these include the need for a gradual introduction of the ETS, aligned with technology and charging infrastructure developments the avoidance of multiple taxation/charging for CO2 emissions and the reinvestment of revenues earned from ETS for road back into the road transport sector.ĭespite our industry’s constructive approach, the political debate has become hostile to the road transport sector.
IRU has suggested crucial changes to EU legislators in order to enable the proposal to achieve its goals. We also agree that the Commission’s impact assessment on ETS is too vague regarding the overall cost effect on the commercial road transport sector. Whilst IRU considers that a well-structured ETS for road could support decarbonisation, we agree with TRAN’s analysis that the European Commission’s proposed text lacks vision and pragmatism. IRU has welcomed the TRAN Committee’s criticism of the European Commission’s proposal to extend the ETS to road transport.
The European Parliament’s TRAN (Transport and Tourism) Committee has voted against extending the Emission Trading System (ETS) to road transport and buildings.
0 kommentar(er)
